|
|
Post by joe on Dec 28, 2008 16:05:26 GMT -5
What -- so because the big-time philosopher registered and posted on the b*tchy job-seeker message board, you're all just going to back down and forget you had opinions?
Sheesh. Pretty pathetic.
|
|
ProfessionalSkeptic
Guest
|
Post by ProfessionalSkeptic on Dec 29, 2008 23:11:31 GMT -5
Uh...actually, Joe, I don't think anyone expressed any beliefs in this thread that have been retracted in light of Geoff's comment. We figured out that there were multiple versions of the email (and Geoff confirmed that), which resolved the puzzles about how you could email 300 people and tell all of them what Geoff told Fuzzbuster.
Are you just trolling, or what?
|
|
|
|
Post by apdent on Jan 2, 2009 4:58:57 GMT -5
Joe, I again have to point to the conditional form of my statement, and the fact that the falsehood of the antecedent establishes the truth of the conditional. I do not retract my conditional statement in any shape or form. But, as Professional Skeptic says above, our information together with Geoff's statement establish the falsehood of the antecedent convincingly enough for most of us.
|
|
